Ps 19:1-2
1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
2 Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.

The guiding principle behind many of the great scientists was the belief that they were exploring creation for the glory of God.

Here is an excerpt from a letter to the Times from Hugh McGavock (Visiting Professor, Prescribing Science, University of Ulster), published: 9th September 2000: 

Like many scientists, my limited knowledge of a tiny fraction of the observable Universe leads me to a sense of its awesome complexity, perfection and beauty, especially in the revelations of molecular biology. I am reduced to humble admiration in contemplating the Creator's mind. .. . 

• There are Laws of nature
• Therefore there must be a  Law Giver 
• The force that makes an apple fall is the same force that keeps the moon in orbit
• Therefore the universe must have one law giver.

Two of present Nobel Prize winners are committed Christians.

Sir Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947). English mathematician and philosopher.) said that this was no accident. C. S. Lewis sums Whitehead's position as follows:

Men became scientific because they expected law in nature and they expected law in nature because they believed in a lawgiver.

But what if such interventions are not necessary ?  That would raise an even more interesting question, wouldn’t it ?   How did the universe come to possess the abilities for organizing atoms into elephants ?   Science crafts clever theories about how things get formed, but why is the stuff of the universe able to arrange itself into these forms?
Why, for instance, should protons and neutrons be able to combine into the nuclei of a hundred different chemical elements?  And why should the atoms of these elements be inclined to gather into molecules  -  from simple molecules like carbon dioxide to complex coils of DNA molecules essential for life ?  It would be so easy to imagine a universe with elementary constituents that did not have these gifts for forming things.
Questions of this sort are seldom asked in a typical science course.  Having taught physics for many years, I know the usual routine.  We tell students about the basic forces of interaction.  We write down the “laws of physics” that provide us with a cause-and-effect story for what happens when things interact.  That should settle it, right ?
Perhaps.  But it depends on what needs to be settled.  If the question were simply, What happens when things interact ?  then the standard textbook approach would be adequate.  But I want to ask a more profound question.   I want to know why there are such things as interaction forces in the first place, and why things are gifted with the ability to respond to these forces in the particular ways that we observe.
In short, why does the universe work ?   Where do the universe’s “natural” abilities come from? What is the ultimate source of the properties and interactions that we take for granted as ordinary ?
What we call “ordinary” turns out to be truly awesome when you think about it. I want to know where the universe gets its awesome character. Science has no answers to questions like this.

The Only thing incomprehensible about the Universe is that it is comprehensible.

The scientists tell us that if the universe were not so large - all have collapsed in on itself long ago - never been any stars, therefore no sun and no earth.

If they are right the universe began the size of an atom - not thousands of billions times bigger than us but thousands of billions times smaller than us.

Pagan View.
The stars are gods OR the universe as a whole is part of God. If that were the case we would never really investigate it - irreverent to probe and - science never really get off the ground.

Atheist View. There would be no laws of nature.
Einstein (in his later life he mocked atheism) said that the one thing science can never discover is why the universe is intelligible - where the laws of nature came from.
This, he said, is the weak point in all the atheist arguments.

Fine Tuning.
Have you ever had a problem with a shower that had to be very finely tuned to get the temperature right?

If any of the fundamental forces of nature (eg gravity) were different (stronger or weaker) by a factor of one in many million there would be no stars and therefore no sun nor earth. 
One well known non religious Oxford mathematician says that the chances of finding a universe like ours would be like finding, after an earthquake, a ball point pen standing on its point.

Einstein:

`You will hardly find one among the profounder sort of scientific minds without a religious feeling of his own...  His religious feeling takes the form of rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that compared with it, all the scientific thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.   This feeling is the guiding principle of his life and work, in so far as he succeeds in keeping himself from the shackles of selfish desire.   It is beyond question closely akin to that which has possessed the religious geniuses of all ages.

Pour forth speech - Bubbling Up.
Scientists never out of work - always more to explore
Nature never stops telling us to look to its Creator.
Richard Dawkins: Religion is like the small pox virus but much more difficult to eradicate.
People can't match Richard Dawkins quick witted rhetoric but deep down they know that what he argues for is absurd.

Pour Forth Speech - another meaning
Language - information everywhere in nature.
Information technology.
Edward Wilson (Non religious prize winning American Scientist):

Cells use very modern technology involving digital logic, analogue-digital conversion and signal integration and this complexity exceeds that of super-computers and space vehicles.

It is information, words, instructions . . .   Think of a billion discrete digital characters . . .   If you want to understand life, think about information technology.

Douglas Hofstadter (famous non religous AI expert):

"A natural and fundamental question to ask, on learning of these incredibly, intricately interlocking pieces of software and hardware is:  'How did they ever get started in the first place?' . . . from simple molecules to entire cells is almost beyond one's power to imagine.   There are various theories on the origin of life.   They all run aground on this most central of central questions:  'How did the Genetic Code, along with the mechanisms for it translation originate?'"

Even at the foundation of the non living world, quantum physics has uncovered waves of mathematical information which are the source of all matter/energy.

What is everything made of?

• Molecules, atoms, protons, electrons, quarks, --- on and on forever?
• Something made of nothing?
• Waves of information.

• Patterns or writing?
• If it is writing - proof that humans did it.

Word of God is the source of the wonderful order of natural world.

A Miracle might be the action of God when He feeds in information. 
Same principle as creation of universe:
He spoke … 

• Revives soul.
• Make wise the simple
• Joy to the heart
• Full of light
• Righteous
• Precious
• Warning
• Reward

Beautiful.
Galaxies, sunsets, underlying biology, physics and mathematics.
Creation and Redemption are beautiful.
(Yet in art, beauty has become for many a shunned word.)

We can contemplate, ponder, think, wonder at beauty, and make decisions.

Unlike computers we are conscious beings.
We can understand a computer from outside looking in.

I can't know you by examining you on operating table.
What it really is like to be you.

You are not just body and brain.

The phrase you and I often use `My body my brain' - imply that your  body and brain belong to you -  but you are more than them.

How do you know me from the Inside looking out? - Not be science.

There is a way of knowing one another that way:
Friendship.
Living in one another's presence and hearing what one another say - Word.
It is a real way of knowing.
1 Cor 2:11-12,
11 For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man's spirit within him? In the same way no-one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.
12 We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. 

Gospel is that God does not just know us from the outside looking in  but from inside looking out.

Sin and suffering and death - not just as an onlooker but One who has come right to us.

1 Cor 2:16 "For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ.

Through God's Spirit and Word we actually know a little at least of what it is like to be God.

See in the Cross how God suffers with us for the sins of world.

Because I am not a computer 
- but a being with body and soul, 
- I can really think freely
- therefore my thoughts can be really pleasing or otherwise to God.
Ps 19:14
14 May the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, O LORD, my Rock and my Redeemer.

Go to Sermon Notes page.

Go to Main page of `Faith and the Modern World.